4. The Flemish: what makes their Sammy run?
800.000 Flemish are supposed to have voted for the extremist right. Those are protest votes of people being disappointed by politics in general rather than craving for an independent Flanders.
Next are the nationalists. A lot of their leaders are former members of extreme right. Nationalists have a strong believe that Flanders would be better of without Wallonia. Their most common objection is that the south takes profit of the hard working north. They don’t want to take this in account as a form of solidarity. Recent fraud-scandals concerning socialist politicians in Wallonia have enhanced that opinion or rather the perception. Perception is a stronger weapon than opinion: make believe is stronger than incite reasoning.
Extremist and Nationalist politicians are confectioning the truth out of the clichés.
Notice that we are speaking about extremists and nationalist. The silent majority of Flemish
Doesn’t necessarily agree with this reluctant strive for independence. The same can be told about the silent majority of Walloons.
Conclusion: one could only hope both were not silent.
5. The Walloons: what triggers their aversion towards Dutch & Flemish?
The French speaking population of Wallonia and Brussels is transferring a difficult period in their existence. Not only they suffer from the industrial decline but also they feel that the French cultural hegemony is over. On the one hand they are in a period of economical conversion but they notice that their domestic servants and even their children speak more languages than themselves. Of course they encourage bilingualism and the knowledge of English and Spanish but it is hard to admit that French is no longer a world language. Their firm believe that Brussels is a 95 percent French speaking town is contradicted by all the different languages they are confronted with on the street (amongst others Arabic). They confound mother tongue and occasional language. And that is what triggers their aversion towards Dutch.
While Flemish nationalists focus on territory, Walloon nationalists focus on language. Strangely enough they believe that “the language is the essence of the nation”, a slogan the Flemish nationalists left behind in the twentieth century. Flemish excel in apprehending foreign languages. Still in the midst of the sixties the Walloon Indepence Movement proclaimed that Belgium was born out of a revolution against Holland and the Dutch language and that obliging bilingualism was a form of treason. (Under the Dutch reign the official language in Belgium was French!).
Conclusion: you’ll never make a brotherhood out of extremism and frustration.
(to be continued)

Beste Six
Geachte Gerrit,
Als regelmatige treinreiziger op de lijn Antwerpen-Brussel, zit ik wel een op een trein die uit Amsterdam komt.
Soms laat een slordige Hollander dan wel een een exemplaar liggen van het dagblad De Pers, interessante lectuur, waar ik als nieuwsgierige Belg wel graag in snuffel. Al is het maar om te vergelijken met de Belgische kranten.
Op donderdag 15 november kreeg ik ook zo’n exemplaar in handen. Op de voorpagina stond een artikel van uw hand: ‘België door de ogen van een Belg’. Het is een zodanig mooi en verhelderend artikel (zo wist ik – als twintiger – niet dat de Vlamingen eigenlijk aan de basis liggen van de toevloed van Franstaligen, cfr. de immo-hausse bij de komst van het EU-parlement) dat ik me afvraag of u het zou toelaten dat ik de tekst overneem om deze te publiceren op mijn website.
Ik ben uitbater van een politieke portaalsite: politicsinfo.net.
De site bestaat uit drie delen: politieke actualiteit, politieke persberichten en politieke dossiers.
Bij deze vraag ik dus formeel, wenst u de tekst van het artikel vrij te geven, om het aan te wenden als educatief materiaal in de rubriek: ‘Politieke Dossiers’?
Uiteraard zou ik u enorm dankbaar zijn.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Webmaster Politicsinfo.net
Vier bladzijden to explain Belgium from a Brussels-Flemish point of view is a bit on the ‘light side,’my dear.
Of course si vos lecteurs are insiders ,dan is het aanvaardbaar ,but if you try to give an explanation to ‘outsiders’ ce n’est qu’une caricature.
We’re just back from a stay in la France profonde (Cantal) ,they asked about Belgium and its problems,and believe me I could tell them anything crossing my mind and they would BELIEVE me .
Belgium and Belgians (Flemish and Wallooons) are just a big lie and a fat joke that ain’t funny no more.
Gardons les pieds sur terre…
(Euh,de Vlaamse versie niet gevonden.,enfin educatief materiaal …far-fetched ,no?)
Ik vind het een meer dan acceptabele uitleg voor de gemiddelde buitenstaander.
En nu maar hopen dat uw politici het zullen lezen en begrijpen en eindelijk eens aan het werk gaan teneinde uw sympathieke en charmante land van de naargeestige ondergang te redden…
Niet educatief dan? Of is ook dat vergezocht? Jij hebt wel een enge definitie van educatie. Waarschijnlijk ben jij bijgevolg… een docent. Of journalist. ;)
Inderdaad:ex-docent…
Mag ik er even aan herinneren dat dit stuk exclusief voor de export bedoeld is, Ik heb dusdanig gevulgariseerd dat inlandse kenners mij gaan willen betrappen op onzorgvuldigheden of generalisaties en daar schieten we dan het doel voorbij: being comprehensible for foreigners. c’Etait codifier incodifiable om een frans chansonnier te parafraseren.
Nice initiative this site, because it makes people think.
I’m afraid Belgium will split, because there are now Belgian media left and in the two main languages people are quite differently structuring reality.
I’m afraid that there is a little error in your information: Yves Leterme was elected by 800 000 votes with a clear mandate to forfill his promise to split BHV (Brussels – Halle/Vilvoorde).
It was he who launched the idea that this would only take “5 minutes of political will”.
His Christian Democratic Party (CD&V Christian – Democrate and Flemish) went to the election together with the NV-A (New Flemish Alliance), a part of the former VU (People Union) party.
Winning the election is one thing, realizing something you’ve promised is another…
I have the impression that the only true belgian left are the emmigrants being nationalised (I’m one). We have chosen Belgium as hosting land, not Flanderen, not Wallonia. I’m living in Belgium sins 30 years, speaking both national languages, having a Flemish husband and Frensh speaking childeren, and I love Belgium: people are really nice, there is no shovinism, a lot of progmatism, good organisation and a lot of humour.
But when during years people from both sides was “solving diffirent problem with the same solution” as you say is so nicely, there is a necessity to reopen the debate, and to analyse the problem first.
We need also some good politician having the courage to admit the point of view of the other community: some Wallons that will agree that Flemish have to have some control over the money they are giving to Wallonia, and some Flemish that will agree that French- speaking Belgians may eventually lieve in Flanderen without becoiming Flemish.
So it will be good to go to the basis and clearly define what the problem is, how important it is, and what solution can be the most efficient for everybody. Today I have the impression that we try to heal the wonded leg by cutting it away.
So who is a wize politician I can give my voice to ?
Pingback: The perfect Christmas gift for yourself or your beloved: the Belgian Citizenship | Sixlog
Pingback: Everything you wanted to know about the Belgian crisis and were afraid to ask | Sixlog